<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you sculpt PageRank using nofollow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/</link>
	<description>The most useful SEO and monetization tips I can find</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Nice, I like the chart.  Did it make you $300?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, I like the chart.  Did it make you $300?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t let your web design firm trash your Google rankings &#124; Church Website Help</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t let your web design firm trash your Google rankings &#124; Church Website Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>[...] companies, and you don&#8217;t even know it.  A while back on my SEO blog I talked about the benefits of doing some minor PageRank sculpting to your site.  Another simple piece you could add to that is the tiny bit of text in the footer of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] companies, and you don&#8217;t even know it.  A while back on my SEO blog I talked about the benefits of doing some minor PageRank sculpting to your site.  Another simple piece you could add to that is the tiny bit of text in the footer of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete White</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>The plugin commentluv is really good especially with the do follow plugin www.commentluv.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plugin commentluv is really good especially with the do follow plugin <a href="http://www.commentluv.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.commentluv.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hendison</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hendison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mickey, I'll grab Fancy Zoom - 

So I'm looking at the Robots-meta plugin, and I guess I didn't realize the depth it offered. All of Joost's stuff is a;lways great, but I never thought I needed that before....

I've always just put up my own robots file, but it looks pretty good! Thanks AGAIN, and I've now got another plugin for my standard install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mickey, I&#8217;ll grab Fancy Zoom - </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m looking at the Robots-meta plugin, and I guess I didn&#8217;t realize the depth it offered. All of Joost&#8217;s stuff is a;lways great, but I never thought I needed that before&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always just put up my own robots file, but it looks pretty good! Thanks AGAIN, and I&#8217;ve now got another plugin for my standard install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I've been playing with the "Robots-Meta" plug-in by Joost de Valk. I've added it to some of my blogs in an effort to do a little better sculpting.  Info/download here:

http://www.joostdevalk.nl/whats-the-pagerank-of-your-wp-admin-dir/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with the &#8220;Robots-Meta&#8221; plug-in by Joost de Valk. I&#8217;ve added it to some of my blogs in an effort to do a little better sculpting.  Info/download here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/whats-the-pagerank-of-your-wp-admin-dir/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/whats-the-pagerank-of-your-wp-admin-dir/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Scott -- The plug-in is called "FancyZoom".  I covered my favorite plug-ins in &lt;a href="http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080308/wordpress-plug-ins-that-i-use/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.  Here is a link directly to the FancyZoom page:
http://www.wpelements.com/2008/02/27/my-first-attempt-at-a-plugin-fancy-zoom/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8212; The plug-in is called &#8220;FancyZoom&#8221;.  I covered my favorite plug-ins in <a href="http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080308/wordpress-plug-ins-that-i-use/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>.  Here is a link directly to the FancyZoom page:<br />
<a href="http://www.wpelements.com/2008/02/27/my-first-attempt-at-a-plugin-fancy-zoom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wpelements.com/2008/02/27/my-first-attempt-at-a-plugin-fancy-zoom/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhilash</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>abhilash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Agreed. It's either something that should be done once a campaign is really mature and just needs some "tweeking" and work on finer points, or else something (as you mention) that can be done quickly and initially because there's really no harm in n/f'ing those privacy &#38; terms pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. It&#8217;s either something that should be done once a campaign is really mature and just needs some &#8220;tweeking&#8221; and work on finer points, or else something (as you mention) that can be done quickly and initially because there&#8217;s really no harm in n/f&#8217;ing those privacy &amp; terms pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hendison</title>
		<link>http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hendison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mickmelseo.com/20080314/should-you-sculpt-pagerank-using-nofollow/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Well put - straight to the point. Whenever someone claims it's "not worth it", or that it's "not necessary" I just can't believe how shortsighted they are.

Hey, what plugin are you using for that image of the chart? I like that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put - straight to the point. Whenever someone claims it&#8217;s &#8220;not worth it&#8221;, or that it&#8217;s &#8220;not necessary&#8221; I just can&#8217;t believe how shortsighted they are.</p>
<p>Hey, what plugin are you using for that image of the chart? I like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
